Archive

Archive for December, 2010

Intel’s Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge

December 8th, 2010 No comments

Here we go again! Time for a major release from Intel… and following suite is a new socket to go with it. LGA1155.. That’s right one pin less than LGA 1156.. and a far cry from LGA1366.

So what’s new about it? 32nm process for one. Reworked memory controller for two. Integrated graphics for three! w0000t! There will also be offerings with dual core graphics processing in the i5 and i7 versions! Synopsis? More processing from less power with greater memory performance (two load and store evens per cycle) and decent level graphics quality for the mainstream consumer utilizing DirectX 10.1. Will you be able to run Crysis at maxed out resolutions? Absolutely not. That will remain the realm of standalone GPUs (for now). However you might be able to play it at low resolutions with quality settings reduced. That’s not truly the aim of this series of processors anyways. The idea is to bring quality graphics to laptops according to Intel. That statement, I think, is more of a show for the standalone guys (AMD/ATI and nVidia) than it is about reality. Sure it will be great for laptop offerings but the true potential of these chips will be unleashed in desktops where the power performance isn’t as much of a factor for the consumer. Desktops offer the kind of power envelope where CPU integrated graphics can truly bloom. Only the future will tell the tall however.

My thoughts? EXCITED! Not as much for Sandy Bridge as I am for Ivy Bridge, it’s successor which is set, supposedly, to be released in the same packaging for socket LGA1155 on a 22nm manufacturing process. Ivy Bridge is rumored to be released with a minimum of eight processing cores and possibly as many as 12 in certain offerings. It is rumored to include integrated graphics with twice the shaders and double the throughput as the Sandy Bridge architecture and will support DirectX 11!!!! My sincere hope as a recreational level gamer is to see SLI and Crossfire support so that these on die graphic processors can be linked up with standalone products. As a consumer I’d like to see this offered standard. As a consultant I’d advise to make a separate offering that supports this. Something akin to how you can purchase an unlocked i7, dubbed “K” series. i7-2600K SLI anyone??? Yes please!

I wouldn’t be surprised either to see a second socket made available for both Sandy and Ivy bridge with additional pins in order to support higher bandwidth. Word is that the larger socket will be (coincidentally) LGA2011. My guess would be that the second package (LGA2011) will be made available in late Q4 2011 right around when Ivy Bridge is being introduced.

It is exciting times! Personally I can’t wait to put together a new system with Intel’s new lineup. I intend to invest as soon as possible. Intel continues to impress me with both their processor and SSD offerings. To think, I used to be an AMD guy. Bravo Intel.

Oracle Acquires Sun Microsystems

December 2nd, 2010 No comments

Alright, so this happened a while ago. Back in January of this year. This is my first opportunity to really talk about it. Well, overall I have to say it’s been a negative for me personally. My primary let down was more recent with the death of OpenSolaris(or should I say murder?). Really this was tragic for me. I love OpenSolaris. I think it has a lot to offer the SMB and even some enterprise markets on a budget. Personally I use it to safeguard my data using ZFS volumes which are exported to iSCSI targets using COMSTAR, over which I place a NTFS partition since the majority of my work is done from a Windows machine. Lightning fast? No. It works exactly as I need it to. It checksums my data and provides easy backups, not to mention deduplication.

Anyways, I ‘m getting off target here. Oracle seems to be following suit with the rest of the big boys with all of the patent and copyright lawsuits. It seems that litigation has become a revenue producing branch of every large corporation these days. Especially software companies. It’s a sad progression to watch because I believe it is stifling innovation. It’s difficult to pass judgment because  companies and individuals deserve to reap the benefits of their creations but at the same time there needs to be a cohesiveness with innovation and progress. We can’t hold ourselves 10 years behind the curve so that XYZ company can squeeze that last .1% in profits out of their properties/products.

Oh Oracle. I hope  that, going forward, this doesn’t get any worse. You’re upsetting people. =(

Categories: Opinions, Solaris, Unix Tags: